JEANNETTE RANKIN

What one decides to do in crisis depends on one's philosophy of life, and that philosophy cannot be changed by an incident. If one hasn't any philosophy in crises, others make the decision.

It is unconscionable that 10,000 boys have died in Vietnam. If 10,000 American women had mind enough they could end the war, if they were committed to the task, even if it meant going to jail.

If I had my life to live over, I would do it all again, but this time I would be nastier.

As a woman I can't go to war, and I refuse to send anyone else.

Small use it will be to save democracy for the race if we cannot save the race for democracy.

Men and women are like right and left hands; it doesn't make sense not to use both.

We're half the people; we should be half the Congress.

You can no more win a war than you can win an earthquake.

War is the slaughter of human beings, temporarily regarded as enemies, on as large a scale as possible.

Killing more people won't help matters.

There can be no compromise with war; it cannot be reformed or controlled; cannot be disciplined into decency or codified into common sense.

You take people as far as they will go, not as far as you would like them to go.

We could have peace in one year if women were organized.

Establish democracy ... based on human rights as superior to property rights.

I want to stand by my country, but I cannot vote for war. I vote no!

I love my country but I cannot vote for war.

Women got the vote in Montana because the spirit of pioneer days is still alive.

We have to get it into our heads once and for all that we cannot settle disputes by eliminating human beings.

Go! Go! Go! It makes no difference where, just so you go! Go! Go! Remember, at the first opportunity, go.

If they are going to have war, they ought to take the old men and leave the young to propagate the race.

It will be hard to convince people that their welfare is safe in the hands of a federal government when they feel themselves the victims of unjust sectional discrimination.

We reasoned that the men would find it difficult to vote against the women in their home states when a woman was sitting with them making laws.

Might it not be that a great force that has always been thinking in terms of human needs, and that always will think in terms of human needs, has not been mobilized? Is it not possible that the women of the country have something of value to give the nation at this time?

How can people in other countries who are trying to grasp our plan of democracy avoid stumbling over our logic when we deny the first steps in democracy to our women?

If you're against war, you're against war regardless of what happens. It's a wrong method of trying to settle a dispute.