The people of the various provinces are strictly forbidden to have in their possession any swords, short swords, bows, spears, firearms, or other types of arms.
There are some weapons that are just so dangerous that society has a right and the obligation even to take those weapons out of circulation.
A convention on the comprehensive ban of nuclear weapons should be negotiated. Since biological and chemical weapons have been prohibited, there is no reason why nuclear weapons, which are more destructive, should not be comprehensively banned and thoroughly destroyed. All it takes to reach this objective is strong political will.
If a law could keep dangerous weapons out of the hands of dangerous people, there would be virtually no gun crime at all.
One cannot expect people to quit seeking new weapons as long as the tactical advantages of weapon are seem to outweigh the costs imposed by prohibition. The only way to make people give up their guns is to create a world in which guns are perceived as having little value.
Assault weapons ban reintroduced.
The people of the various provinces are strictly forbidden to have in their possession any swords, bows, spears, firearms or other types of arms. The possession of these elements makes difficult the collection of taxes and dues, and tends to permit uprising.
Certain forms of ammunition have no legitimate sporting, recreational, or self-defense use and thus should be prohibited.
A ban on a class of arms is not an 'incidental' regulation. It is equivalent to a ban on a category of speech.
