Strong Encryption Quotes
The FBI had obtained a court order requiring apple to write software that could hack into a person's iPhone. Apple, with most other hi-tech companies in support, filed a motion with the court opposing the order. The FBI shortly thereafter withdrew its request for the order saying that they had found other solutions, when they had originally told the court that there were no other solutions.
The FBI had obtained a court order requiring apple to write software that could hack into a person's iPhone. Apple, with most other hi-tech companies in support, filed a motion with the court opposing the order. The FBI shortly thereafter withdrew its request for the order saying that they had found other solutions, when they had originally told the court that there were no other solutions. The issue however was and remains a very difficult political, moral, ethical, and legal conundrum.
Snowden, was a contract worker for Booz Allan assigned to the National Security Agency (NSA). He felt that some of the NSA activities were illegal and unethical and tried to complain to NSA officials who rebuffed him. Despite the fact that he had signed an agreement not to do so, he copied many critical, classified documents that exposed much of the NSA activities that the NSA officials had denied existed—including lying under oath to the Senate. Laura Poitras, the journalist, was not accused or suspected of anything. However, on the belief, that Snowden might have given her some classified material, the American government prevailed upon the British to seize her personal computer. Snowden made the programs public as the highest level intelligence officials were lying to Congress about them. The position of the US Government was that Snowden had violated American Law. Others praised him for revealing illegal activities in which the government was engaged and was lying about including to the Congressional oversight committees. Snowden repeatedly outsmarted the government and ended up getting asylum in Russia. In the case of the computer material, he had encrypted the material using “strong encryption” which most computer experts believe is impossible even for the best code breakers and computers to crack. See {628105} . In this quotation he argues that all journalists should use strong encryption on ALL of their notes and other materials that they receive from confidential sources. Government officials had tried to keep strong encryption secret even though it was invented by a private scientists with no government support or involvement. They failed, but have been trying to find a way to defeat strong encryption since. Ironically, most non-technical private individuals and companies do not use it even though it is quite easy and the software is free. Editors and publishers are ambivalent in that they could not comply with court orders or show them to employees even though it is their own property if the individual reporter or the source did not want them to.
The law enforcement and the intelligence agencies have been claiming for a number of years that etrong encryption (encryption which no one can crack with existing technology) if used by the general public would really hinder law enforcement and espionage efforts. The Federal government actually obtained a court order prohibiting the inventor of the stong encryption frm sharing the equations and techniques with anyone--as blatant an infringement to the right of free speech as there was been. The order was ignored and although the government tried to intimidate the developer by threatening him with prison. He refused to comply and the government finally dropeed the case, as the courts would almost certainly find such a jailing unconstitutional. However, although they tell the courts that there is a clear and present danger if terrorists use encryption, no one had, up to that time, found a single case where being able to decypher the encryption would have prevented an attack.
The FBI had obtained a court order requiring apple to write software that could hack into a person's iPhone. Apple, with most other hi-tech companies in support, filed a motion with the court opposing the order. The FBI shortly thereafter withdrew its request for the order saying that they had found other solutions, when they had originally told the court that there were no other solutions.