Because of Congress’s failure to act, States like Arizona have no choice but to take a strong action to discourage the further flow of illegal immigration through our borders.
Abortion's a private decision. But I just think it shouldn't be federalized.
I believe the Constitution matters: that it's not just a few pieces of paper.
Federal criminal prosecutions are a direct function of the number of U. S. Attorneys. The more prosecutors that are appointed, the more criminal prosecutions there will be.
Immigration policy should be set and enforced federally.
You can't just put the military in the streets of the United States rounding up illegal aliens. I think that would be a violation of federal law.
The responsibility of the Department of Justice, when it comes to law enforcement, is to determine whether crimes have been committed and to prosecute those crimes under the principles of federal prosecution.
The U.S. constitution is an extraordinary document. In my view, it should not be amended often.
There's probably nobody that knows the Justice Department better than me.
We got Defense of Marriage Act as a federal law from President Bill Clinton. And it was passed with bipartisan support.
I never would force the Justice Department to go to California and arrest people getting medical marijuana, when that's the law there.
The reality is for 50 years in this country, federal law has required people that are illegal - or that are immigrants - or that are legal immigrants to this country to carry documentation to that effect. And that has been the law for 50 years.
Almost all law in the United States is State law.
The identity of political donors should be disclosed and bureaucratic rules should not circumvent the original intent of federal law or interfere with the public's ability to hold these organizations accountable.
We believe the Senate language provides for federal subsidies for abortions. Plus there's a language in there where you have to pay one dollar per month, every enrollee, to pay for a fund for reproductive rights which include abortion. And that's totally against federal law. So we are saying take that out.
I think occasionally it's the presence - or increased presence - of federal law enforcement that can cause that fear.
I never use debit cards. I only use credit cards. This way, if someone does get my account number... and charges $1 million, by federal law, my liability is zero.
Yesterday, the Supreme Court spent over an hour listening to arguments on whether Obamacare is unconstitutional. Yeah, listening to arguments about Obamacare for an hour, or as most people call that, 'Thanksgiving Dinner.'
I think the motive is to establish in federal law the personhood from conception forward and try and alter the Constitution through statute.
Our Constitution does not contain the absurdity of giving power to make laws and another to resist them.... The Father of His Country [George Washington] did not affix his revered name to so palpable an absurdity. Nor did the states, when they severally ratified it, do so under the impression that a veto on the laws of the United States was reserved to them or that they could exercise it by implication.
In response to South Carolina's nullification of the Tariff Act of 1832, President Jackson proclaimed:
Specifically, the reservation of sovereignty to the people of the states in matters not governed by federal law is constitutionally defined and permanently enshrined in the 10th Amendment.
No branch of the law is of more importance to the counsellor, the statesman, or the citizen, than a thorough acquaintance with the Constitution and laws of the Federal Government, as they are administered and as they affect the rights of the people.
Arguments premised upon the Federal 2nd Amendment ... have never prevented regulation of firearms.
The U. S. Code of Federal Regulations is over 170 thousand ages long.
When Federal law conflicts with state laws and the will of the American people, it's time to change the laws, not circulate edicts.