BRUCE JACKSON

It is not at all clear how much the media influences public opinion and how much public opinion influences the media.

I'm a schoolteacher and a writer. So that's what I do.

When friends and lovers die and your world gets quieter; that's when the silence comes closer; that's when next isn't the least bit theoretical or abstract.

You've gotten words about those American and Iraqi deaths and mutilations, but precious few images.

For governments at war, the media is an instrument of war or an element in war that is to be controlled.

The daily press, the immediate media, is superb at synecdoche, at giving us a small thing that stands for a much larger thing. Reporters on the ground, embedded or otherwise, can tell us about or send us pictures of what happened in that place at that time among those people.

Books can now be on the stands within days from delivery of a formatted manuscript, and often are.

Television broadcasts have, in the main, been more suggestive, less specific, more distant in their images than the print press: often you knew that lump was a dead body only because a chattering reporter told you it was.

America has the longest prison sentences in the West, yet the only condition long sentences demonstrably cure is heterosexuality.

The key fact missed most often by social scientists utilizing documentary films for data, is this: documentary films are not found or reported things; they're made things.

Vietnam is often called our only uncensored war, but that only means that the government wasn't vetting the pictures and words.

They say the death of a parent puts you in time because that means there's now no generation standing between you and ordinary death: you're next. I don't buy it.

Which suggests something about media and war: it's not just that events happen and the media documents and presents them. There is a third element: what the public is ready to accept, what the public wants to know.

Bridges become frames for looking at the world around us.

What is perhaps more worthy of note than how many tsunami dead we've seen, however, is how many other recent dead we have not seen.

Documentary films are created in an inverted funnel of declining possibility.

The media is not at all homogeneous in the way it tells us about war.

Both of our wars in Iraq were, on American television, largely bloodless.

War is grounded in the notion of triumph and defeat. It is zero-sum.

Filmmakers who use narrators pay a price for taking the easy way: narrated films date far more quickly than films without narrators.

All too often, academic departments defend their territory with the passion of cornered animals, though with far less justification.

Technology has changed the way book publishing works, as it has changed everything else in the world of media.

War is big and there are only so many reporters and only so many places for their words and images to appear. Choices are made constantly.

The fact that the Arctic, more than any other populated region of the world, requires the collaboration of so many disciplines and points of view to be understood at all, is a benefit rather than a burden.

All governments in all wars have used all the means at their disposal to put their own motives, decisions and actions, and the actions of their military forces, in the best possible light.