In the Bowling Alley of Tomorrow, there will even be machines that wear rental shoes and throw the ball for you. Your sole function will be to drink beer.
Clearly, I'm for the VAR.
I understand why there is a push for an automated strike zone. However, I do think there would be some unintended consequences of having it that I think need to be addressed first before we would go down that road.
With goal-line technology, there are plenty of results that could be changed.
Obviously you have to trust the VAR to make the right decision.
If I sit here and say I don't agree with VAR, I'd be lying.
Times have changed. Football has changed.
Goal-line technology is a good thing. The ref gets the signal and can decide based on that.
Baseball should adopt replay, plain and simple. If we can see it at home or on hand-held PDAs, the technology should be used in games.
I always said that VAR is a very important tool on objective and important decisions.
I think VAR is a very healthy development within the industry.
In my view, technology should only be used on objective situations - offside, in or out of the box, over the line or not - but when it comes to subjective situations, people are never going to agree. That's sport.
A video referee is useful for sure.
Vodafone is building a digital stadium in Istanbul. It is really worth going to see that. The whole experience will change with the possibilities viewers will have.
I have always said that I am a friend of VAR.
I'm glad to see goal-line technology working; we should have had it for years. I do believe we will soon see managers being allowed one, or two, challenges.
All the major sports have video reviews, and for some reason, the Premier League, which is watched all around the world, is still in the dark ages.
