I think it's this congenital problem with journalism that we oversell the difference we make. We make small differences.
It may happen that small differences in the initial conditions produce very great ones in the final phenomena.
What I do isn't radical. It's just distinct in small ways.
We must not, in trying to think about how we can make a big difference, ignore the small daily differences we can make which, over time, add up to big differences that we often cannot foresee.
The difference between the top performers and the average or mediocre performers is not a great, massive difference. It is just a tiny difference because the top performers do things just a tiny bit.
Inches make champions.
The ethics of plagiarism have turned into the narcissism of small differences: because journalism cannot own up to its heavily derivative nature, it must enforce originality on the level of the sentence.
It's incredible in our sport how small the differences are, and we are all aware of that. We're all on a high level and skiing well, and at the end, it's just hundredths that count. Maybe it's just one finger or a hand can change the color of a medal.
Develop the winning edge; small differences in your performance can lead to large differences in your results.
Intolerance of groups is often, strangely enough, exhibited more strongly against small differences than against fundamental ones.
