If we must have the Production Code, then I think the only way to use it effectively is to judge a film as a whole and determine whether its effect is good or bad.
It is true that no matter how good your film is, you get judged purely on the basis of how well it does at the box office.
I think there are just bad films and good films. Period.
I know there is one kind of cinema that exists in the world, that is good or bad cinema.
We have to create images that remain in people's memory because a film is judged by what they have already seen. You are trying to create an image that is unique and you have to employ all the resources available to you.
I don't think cinema is big or small. It's just good or bad.
If we should pass on whether or not a film is pornographic, we should take a look at it.
The justices as a result viewed the ostensibly pornographic films.
My films ought to be judged on whether they're entertaining or good as films, but not on the political view necessarily. I'm trying to be morally responsible and no more. I don't have an agenda I'm trying to push.
Yes, I want to do good work. But just because a movie is small, it doesn't make it better. In fact, there are a lot of really horrible independent movies made.
We should release films without revealing the director's name, as his or her gender would not be a barometer to watch those films.
I read a lot of scripts, so I know by page 25 if I like it or not.
I don't judge director on the basis of their last film.
My last experience of film-making was Tickets, a three-episode film in Italy, the third of which is directed by myself. It's not for me to judge whether it's a good film or a bad film, but what I could say is that nobody had a cultural or linguistic issue with what was produced.