Currency Exchange Quotes
See {583710} for his grandchild’s variation.
The alternative would have been for the colonies to borrow English money at high interest rates and use that. Or use money from private banks (which occurred later.) Many conservatives are today a little shocked that some of the American Colonies just printed money with no backing but it worked—at least at the local level. A Boston Bank for example, would take a large commission for a Bostonian to convert Pennsylvania money into Massachusetts money. So it was not a very good system for trade between colonies and International trade. But English money was used for that. The colonists pragmatically got the “best of both worlds” and paid as little interest as they needed to. This system is essentially what we use today on a national scale with no gold or silver backing of the money.
At the time, there was no United States currency. Private banks in some of the states issued their own money. A dollar from Georgia might only be worth 75 cents in New York.
Economists they world over have differed as to how critical it was to have a money supply that is based on a gold standard or other precious metal. United States history has had a dispute over whether the money should be backed by gold or silver. Finally, under the Richard M. Nixon administration, the United States went off the gold standard and American money ever since is only backed by the ‘full faith and credit’ of the United States. Some politicians like Paul believe this is a poor policy since it allows governments to control their own money supply irrespective of their gold or silver holdings. Paul goes further than most and sees freedom itself dependent on a precious metal standard. Most politicians disagree.
Despite this economic reality, many underdeveloped nations sell their raw materials because it is easier than the alternative which takes capital investment in processing plants and equipment, training of workers, and establishing a marketing mechanism. Most third world nations are limited in their capacity to do this but they have abundant natural resources.
Attempting to defend charges that his bank and others were engaged in monopolistic practices:
He was against paper money. At the time, any bank could issue its own paper money or “banknotes”. However other banks would not redeem the banknotes for the full amount; they would “discount” the note. Usually, the further away the bank was from the original bank, the more discount they took. Interstate commerce was almost impossible. Alexander Hamilton, Jefferson’s nemesis, had a much more modern point of view and fortunately his view prevailed. Paper money could only work if it was issued by a central bank with no discounting by other banks. The paper money had to be “legal tender”.
