After years of practice, I can walk into a bookstore and understand its layout in a few seconds. I can glance at the spine of a book and make a good guess at its content from a number of signs.
I'm a content creator, so I like to read the comments, and I like to engage, because if people aren't interested in what I'm doing, then I'm not doing a good job.
In deciding the ratings of the films, no consideration is given to artistic, technical or dramatic values. Only moral content is weighed.
Nobody's strong enough to stand up under a flood of weak material.
Connecting with fans is very important to me and useful, too! It's almost as if I have my own focus group. If I put up one picture that gets 1,000 likes and one that gets 15,000 likes, it gives me a big clue as to what people like to see.
A book is not harmless merely because no one is consciously offended by it.
Interpretation, based on the highly dubious theory that a work of art is composed of items of content, violates art. It makes art into an article for use, for arrangement into a mental scheme of categories.
Views online is a real weird and sticky subject. One view on a 30-second piece of content is not equivalent to one view on a 30 minute video. In my mind it's not quite the same thing.
I always believed in curating content, and the only way to do in our country is by turning producer. So then, I thought, lets turn producer and see how it goes.
Working as a showrunner has made it tougher to watch other shows and movies.
There are two generic and invariable features that characterize utopias. One is the content: the authors of utopias paint what they consider to be ideal societies; translating this into the language of mathematics, we might say that utopias bear a + sign. The other feature, organically growing out of the content, is to be found in the form: a utopia is always static; it is always descriptive and has no, of almost no, plot dynamics.
I've spent 10 years checking my analytics on my end to see what people were talking about and what they like.
It’s not whether children learn from television, it’s what children learn from television... because everything that children see on television is teaching them something.
A sodomite got very excited looking at a zoology text. Does this make it pornography?
I'm not going to watch two TV shows with vaginas in them unless somebody tells me why they're different!
If we should pass on whether or not a film is pornographic, we should take a look at it.
The justices as a result viewed the ostensibly pornographic films.
I believe in content, and I go accordingly.
I read every single comment that comes in.
You are not satisfied unless form is so strictly divorced from content that you can comprehend the one without almost without bothering to read the other.
Netflix likes critical attention, and they like their analytics.
Cell-site data - like mailing addresses, phone numbers, and IP addresses - are information that facilitate personal communications rather than part of the content of those communications themselves. The government's collection of business records containing these data, therefore, is not a search.
Questions about form seem as hopelessly inadequate as questions about content.
Is there a more violent book than the Bible?
There are lots of new products and new services making adding content easier. But there's not many people on the other side helping users digest that content.
I like to know why a video has suddenly gone viral, why a song has broken, why a TV show is suddenly rating out of pattern... I'm pretty good at understanding why things are becoming popular.