Oliver Wendell Holmes Sr. Quotes

I like that 3D is based on the fact that you look with two eyes, so two cameras imitate that.

When you put on the glasses in a 3-D movie they just kind of sit there and you forget about them.

3D is the way we experience life.

Oftentimes, when we think of 3D, we think of things coming out of the screen, but actually, you've got this zero, this negative space, what they call the negative space, which is the scene, what's being filmed in the positive space of the audience. As you can have things come out, you can have all of this depth.

Just like those little Viewmaster slides, there's a inherent magic that's captured in 3D that you can't get in drawn animation or in CG.

The 3D world allows you to engage even more with a film because you're somehow drawn into the landscape or the universe of that scene. Even when it's two people talking at a table, you feel like you're a third party.

The future of 3D will be defined by TV.

I don't really like watching 3-D.

To someone like Zurbaran, who paints still lifes, lemons and pears are the objects of art. But to the electronics engineer who works on the technologies of virtual reality, the whole reality has become the object of art, with a possibility to substitute the virtual with the real.

A photograph is the illusion of a literal description of how the camera 'saw' a piece of time and space.

Art used to be painting, sculpture, music, etc, but now, all technology has become art. Of course, this form of art is still very primitive, but it is slowly replacing reality.

Photography is the product of complete alienation.

The practice of photography is no longer a means for recording reality. Instead, it has become reality itself

I don't know where the artificial stops and the real starts.

To me, the art of cinema is the same as the art of painting. The artist takes a 2D medium and gives you the illusion of depth. If you look at any of the great paintings, you have the illusion of depth. Which is part of the art. The same with the great movies.

All art is a vision penetrating the illusions of reality, and photography is one form of this vision and revelation.

The realists do not take the photograph for a 'copy' of reality, but for an emanation of past reality, a magic, not an art.

Images are made palpable, ironed flat by technology and, in turn, dictate the seemingly real through the representative.

Back in the 1980s, when the internet was only available to a small number of pioneers, I was often confronted by people who feared that the strange technologies I was working on, like virtual reality, might unleash the demons of human nature. For instance, would people become addicted to virtual reality as if it were a drug? Would they become trapped in it, unable to escape back to the physical world where the rest of us live? Some of the questions were silly, and others were prescient.

Reality is the temporary resultant of continuous struggles between rival gangs of programmers.

Virtual Reality is going to be an important technology. I am pretty confident about this.

I feel all things as dynamic events, being, changing, and interacting with each other in space and time even as I photograph them.

These new technologies try to make virtual reality more powerful than actual reality, which is the true accident. The day when virtual reality becomes more powerful than reality will be the day of the big accident. Mankind never experienced such an extraordinary accident.

Nothing is as deceptive as a photograph.

The dimensionality of 3D, the depth of field, the dynamism... it's an immersive experience. And on top of that it's great because the new glasses don't make you want to throw up and they don't give you paper cuts!