Richard K. Betts Quotes
Deterrence is … a weak tool in the increasingly important realm of cyberspace, where it can be extremely difficult to be absolutely sure of an attacker’s identity.
Richard K. Betts, Professor and Director of the Saltzman Institute of War and Peace Studies and Columbia University “The Lost Logic of Deterrence: What the Strategy That Won the Cold War Can—and Can’t—Do Now”, Foreign Affairs, March / April 2013
Sourced by: Eigen's Political and Historical Quotations
Many computer experts and security operatives view this kind of advice and strategy as counter-productive as there are some computer security extremists who so harden computer systems and networks that they function poorly and cause really harmful operational problems. The classic case was the FBI agent in Minnesota who before 9-11 had information that Muslims foreigners were taking flying lessons. She wanted to get the information to the national security FBI people, but she was not allowed to send the information by e-mail. Instead she had to use a "secure" system that was much slower and could not be viewed by the people who might have been able to connect the dots and do something about it. The FBI has now a better balance between functionality and security, but it is a good example of how "security fanaticism" can make us less safe.
Many people not only disagreed with him but thought is analogy was also wrong. Most of the nations in the world do not have a navy. The few that do, have never claimed that the navy was deployed for civilian purposes. They did so to protect their merchant ships, prevent blockades and to project power—all military activities. Critics observe that few nations would risk a situation where their enemies might cyberattack them and they would have no defenses and could not counterattack. So other nations will respond to large cyberdefenses deployed by some countries with an “arms race” of cyberdefense. The reason the United States added 4000 personnel to Cyber Command was because China and Russia had deployed cyberdefense capability. Also cyberdefense capability produces cyberattack capability. These critics argue that cyberspace is already militarized.
In addition to the hackers who break into websites for monetary gain, or spying for companies or governments, there are many why just love the challenge of hacking into computers and websites that authorities claim is secure. The reality is that there is no way to absolutely sure a computer or its contents as long as it is connected to the Internet. Those computers and sites that have nothing to hide and do not present a challenge to hackers of this type rarely have problems from them; their vulnerability is to the other hacker who can utilize their computer slo hack still others of paralyze their computer to extract a ransom for functionality. The analogy of the hackers to the barbarian hordes sacking Ancient Rome and the Mongolian hordes sacking Europe is one that many appreciated,
A few weeks before, the computers of the Democratic National Committee were hacked and thousands of private and confidential e-mails were made public. The security experts claimed that the hackers came from Russia.
In the early 21st century hackers who committed fraud and stole much money were not considered as serious as hackers who would have a political (anti-government) message display on the government’s own website. The latter were considered much more of a threat than the former although the only “damage” the former did was inconvenience and embarassment to government officials.
Describing the increasing trend of young computer hackers who generally had hacked just for the challenge getting involved in hacking with a political and ideological causes—sometimes even working for governments.
Richard Kevin Betts is an American political scientist and international relations scholar who centers on U.S. foreign policy. He is currently the Arnold Saltzman Professor of War and Peace Studies in the Department of Political Science, the director of the International Security Policy Program in the School of International and Public Affairs at Columbia University, and former director of the Institute of War and Peace Studies.