WILLIAM THE CONQUEROR
(William I | William the Bastard)
William the Conqueror. The King had come ashore and fell forward in the sand on his face and hands. Showing a sense of humor, he hade this statement. Shortly thereafter he took England militarily at Hastings and seized it politically.
William the Conqueror. Note that it was OK to trade, buy and sell slaves and indentured servants as long as foreigners didn’t get the benefit of them.
William the Conqueror. This is one of the first if not the first nationwide abolition of capital punishment in history. Ironically, the two alternatives that the abolition law allowed would both be illegal and repugnant to us today even though we allow capital punishment.
William the Conqueror. This is one of the earliest government action separating some church functions from state functions.
William the Conqueror. In Wager of Battle—often called “trial by combat”, a guilty person could challenge his accuser to combat. If the accuser won, the person must have been guilty; if the accused person won, he must have been falsely accused. It was assumed that this method gave God a clear opportunity to do justice. As silly as this appears to us today, at the time, most people believed that God was indeed looking at every event and would intercede to be sure that justice would prevail. In reality, it allowed the stronger men with good weapons skills to literally get away with murder or anything else. A similar logic operated with the Ordeal of Iron and other so called “ordeals”. In the ordeal by iron, the accused was required to lift a red hot iron rod. He would of course be burned. If the burn healed, God was showing that he was innocent. But if the burn festered and got infected, God was showing that he was guilty. If he didn’t die of gangrene or other infection, he could then be executed or otherwise punished. In England the Ordeal by Iron commanded by King William was abolished in 1215. Some scholars argued that there was a method to the madness of trial by ordeal. If most people were so religious or superstitious that they believed that God would be sure that the right outcome would prevail. A false accuser would recant rather than expose himself to almost certain death in combat with an innocent person who God would surely protect. Of course the pious people would be at a great disadvantage to the non-believers who would not be intimidated. Trial by combat lasted much longer and evolved into dueling which was quite prevalent in America until later in the 19th century.
William the Conqueror. Harold II was chosen as king of England after the death of Edward the Confessor, however, his claim was disputed by Duke William of Normandy
William I, usually known as William the Conqueror and sometimes William the Bastard, was the first Norman monarch of England, reigning from 1066 until his death in 1087. He was a descendant of Rollo and was Duke of Normandy from 1035 onward. By 1060, following a long struggle to establish his throne, his hold on Normandy was secure. In 1066, following the death of Edward the Confessor, William invaded England, leading an army of Normans to victory over the Anglo-Saxon forces of Harold Godwinson at the Battle of Hastings, and suppressed subsequent English revolts in what has become known as the Norman Conquest. The rest of his life was marked by struggles to consolidate his hold over England and his continental lands, and by difficulties with his eldest son, Robert Curthose.
