Wage Decrease Quotes



This is a brilliant example of political sarcasm to make an important political point. In an effort to evade the Supreme Court Roe v. Wade decision giving women the right to have an abortion, Virginia and several other very conservative states began to pass laws that put impediments in the way of women wanting abortions and/or increasing the cost and hassle of abortion. Virginia passed legislation requiring physicians who might do aboutions to first council the woman in all the risks and negatives of abortion. The “purpose of the act” was supposedly to protect the woman and her rights. However there was no requirement of a physician to communicate the risks of childbirth and so Virginia by this quotation is exposed by only caring about a woman considering abortion being informed of risk, but not worrying about protecting the pregnant woman who is contemplating birth. Charo takes the Virginia statute and rewrites it to apply to women expecting to give birth and requiring the physicians to describe those risks. In the process of creating a parallel law for women interested in giving birth, Charo then is able to show that with the state of medicine at the early 21st century, it was much more risky to give birth than to have an abortion. Anti-abortion believers rarely say (and many do not even know) that the mother to be risks a higher rate of maternal mortality than the woman who chooses abortion. Abortion foes emphasize the mental health implications of having an abortion, yet there was no scientific evidence that it did. There were MANY research studies, however, that mental health problems are a very real risk of childbirth. (Post Partum depression is quite common when the female hormones radically change during pregnancy and childbirth. And ironically Charo would have the obstetrician warn about the economic and social risks of giving birth, just as the Virginia statute required warnings about abortion.