Too Big To Fail Quotes

Abrams originated this famous phrase which many have been used subsequently for various “socialized” government benefits that were available to the rich but not the poor. He was referring to the fact that at the time, the government provided housing assistance to the rich by having federally insured mortgages and granting tax deductions for the interest in home mortgages, but there was no assistance to the poor who could only afford to rent and had no tax deductions nor was there any federal public housing assistance. During the Great Recession the phrase was often used when the government gave bail out money to General Motors and the largest banks who were close to bankruptcy, but the landscaping gardener or the hot dog vendor whose business was falling because of the recession were told that is the capitalist system—there are some winners and some losers. The government officials who advocated the bailout did not disagree about the fairness and appropriateness of the Abrams phrase but if they had not bailed the banks out, the entire economic system of the country would probably have collapsed and the ensuing depression would hurt the average worker and the poor even more. Related to the recent “too big to fail” concept.

This warning was a decade before the Meltdown of 2008, but was not heeded by any of the politicians. As a result a number of the companies that made all those risky decisions assumed that if something went terribly wrong the government would not let them fail. Unfortunately, they were right and the taxpayers spent billions to prevent companies from failing. After the meltdown all the politicians vowed to end the too big to fail concept, but while some improvements were made, the Congress could not come to agreement, and the markets and a number of companies think that they are still too big to fail. This is particularly true for Defense Contractors where the government has and probably will in the future, protect irresponsible companies from failure if they are the only company that makes needed weapons and other equipment.

At this time it was 6 years after the Home Financing Crisis and the Meltdown of 2008 and despite tens of thousands of law violations by the bank, the Justice Department was finally finishing their investigations and requiring some penalties. Other negotiations with other banks were in progress, but no bank executives were going to jail for the millions they handled fraudulently, whereas a burglar who stole household goods would do jail time.

4 years after the Great Recession where major banks of America needed government bailouts to prevent failure the Administration and Federal Reserve board wanted to increase the capital requirements to increase the safety of the Banks. Essentially the banks would speculate and gamble with depositors’ money. If their investment paid off, there were large profits and bonuses for the executives. If it did not, they ran out of capital as they had very little of their own at risk. The government bailed them out and the executives got their bonuses anyway. The efforts to make the banks speculate with more of their own money were strongly opposed by the banks and bank executives.

The Dodd Frank bill was designed, in the aftermath of the large bank induced meltdown of 2008 and the Great Recession, to regulate the banking industry so that no bank would be “too big to fail”. However, although the bill placed many restrictions on the banks to prevent much of their risky economic behavior, which the banks complained inhibited their growth and profitability. However, the bill did not put any limits on the size of the large banks and their critical proportion of the U. S. Financial System. If a bank was large enough, the government did not dare allow the bank to fail regardless of how profligate the Bank had been with its depositors’ money. So the shareholders made big money from the Bank’s risky behavior if it turned out well, and if not the taxpayers had to bail the banks out, because they were too big to fail without causing much of the rest of the country to also fail. Warren and others wanted a simple solution. Break up the large banks into smaller ones and then if any one of the small units makes poor investments, the bank could fail and other than its shareholders and creditors, the effect would not be so serious that the government could not allow the bank to go into bankruptcy. Mismanaged banks could fail like other mismanaged companies and not take down much or the rest of the country with them. But the banks lobbied to prevent that, and by 2014, 6 years after the taxpayers had to bail out banks that were too big to fail, many of the banks were twice as large as they were when they were already too big to fail.