We journalists make it a point to know very little about an extremely wide variety of topics; this is how we stay objective.
I'm not in the judgment part of journalism.
We have not let injustice to be done to anyone. We have been following the policy of 'justice to all, appeasement of none.'
I try not to make snap judgments. I never, ever make conclusions about products I've never tried.
… without animus or partiality.
I don't prejudge issues. I come to every case with an open mind. Every case is new to me.
You know, I’m fan of women in general. I don’t want to discriminate.
In contrast to what most prosecutors do, we try to treat all individuals with complete fairness. We do not go out and hold press conferences and the like.
You can't play someone and judge them at the same time.
Nobody outside of a baby carriage or a judge's chamber believes in an unprejudiced point of view.
I feel very comfortable about being fair to Trump. I think I've been very fair to him.
The idea is to try to give all the information to help others to judge the value of your contribution; not just the information that leads to judgment in one particular direction or another.
It sounds funny, but I always try to keep an open mind about what I'm writing about. Sometimes I squeak my opinions in there, but generally I don't. I try to be objective about things that I'm writing about.
