Well, I have no problem with 3-D but I don't think it's necessarily a blanket requirement for every film.
I have nothing against 3D films but I do not need to see them.
I love film, and I love seeing movies on film.
Experiencing this film in 2-D is only getting about 20 percent of the experience of 'Gravity.'
I believe that DVD is that which gives some hope to retaining some content in movies that will appeal to an older audience or the more sophisticated audience or the audience that doesn't need or desire to see a movie on a Friday night.
Big, big movies are in 3D, but we haven't reached a point yet where that's just what a movie is.
I was fed up with not being able to play a movie the way I wanted to play it.
I'm a big 3-D convert.
Sometimes I don't know whether a movie has been shot on film or in digital when I watch it in the theatres.
I don't even like DVDs. Honest to God, in my lifetime, I might have rented a dozen DVDs, literally gone into a video store and rented a dozen DVDs in my lifetime, because I don't like to see movies that way. I like to see them on the big screen.
For there to be a 'Community' movie just seems like an appropriate way for the show to go out. That would be my perfect end.
A two-hour movie tends to be a plot-delivery device; you tend to have to introduce all the characters, say what the goal is, and then get there with a setback, but that's not really how life is or what a story necessarily wants to be.
I've had a VHS collection for many, many years. But I would prefer to watch a movie in the best format possible.
It seems that we're heading toward the day that films will be released in all platforms simultaneously, albeit with a cost premium to see it at home. But I hope that theater-going doesn't end - I think that watching movies on the big screen with an audience is still the best format and also an important one for society.
For me the Blu-ray version is kind of the definitive version of the movie.
Not every movie, in my opinion, should be in 3D. There are a lot of stories I wouldn't shoot in 3D. But, you know, there are movies that are perfect in 3D.
Yeah sure, I'd love to have all my movies on DVD.
The thing about HD-DVD that is attractive to Microsoft is that it's very pro-consumer in letting you copy all movies up onto the hard disk.
I can say is usually people are slightly confused. They think that silent movies are old. But, the fact is, they are old because they have been made in the '20s. That's the thing that makes them old. Not the format. The format is just a format. It's not an old format.
I'm very happy where 3-D is going, which is that it's becoming a choice - and thankfully, most people are still choosing 2-D.
I get a little nauseous and disoriented watching 3D, but as a kid I loved it and I was really into it, so if a movie can be in 3D, then why not?
'Banshee' was interesting because it was on cable, and it didn't have commercial breaks, so it read like a movie. Not only because of that, but it was a pretty interesting style, and I hadn't read a show like this.
There are just things you can explore in a movie that you can't in 22 minutes with a laugh track.
The 2-D movie works as well as the 3-D movie. I want to make sure that people like the 2-D version. It's not a gimmick. It actually improves the viewing experience, but the movie stands on its own.
A certain kind of film is a big theatrical film and a certain kind of film isn't. It doesn't bother me so much that you can pick your format.