Regardless of the medium, be it television or feature or documentary, I'm not gonna distinguish and worry about my particular canon, whatever that means.
I think storytelling is storytelling. It doesn't matter what format it's shot on.
The same person is coming through in a different medium.... My art is simple, direct and definite.
The important thing is to do good work, no matter what medium you do it in.
A great song is a great song, whether it's on vinyl or CD or cassette or reel to reel or mp3. Then again, that might be an overly optimistic view, but I do think that great music will transcend the medium in which it is delivered.
Save interesting thoughts, quotations, films, technologies... the medium doesn't matter, so long as it inspires you.
A pattern has an integrity independent of the medium by virtue of which you have received the information that it exists.
When you're doing something where you really like the material, it doesn't matter what medium it's in.
The content has to be good; medium doesn't matter to me.
I really have no preference between TV and film. I think that each individual project is its own thing and has a very different style.
If it's funny or it's good, then yeah, I'll do it. Whether it's big-screen or whatever wouldn't be the deciding factor for me.
My only close-to-game-plan is to follow good writing. If the writing is in TV or if it's in theater or in film, that's it. It doesn't really matter what the medium is.
Basically, I love to act. The medium is not important.
I will continue doing things irrespective of the medium as long as I'm excited about it.
For me it's always been about the stories, not what medium. The medium is secondary to the stories.
To me, music is music, and it's not limited by the medium; it just encompasses everything.
