History was easy, but I don't know about the Calculus. It seemed like it was making sense, so that probably means I failed.
Cancel me not - for what then shall remain? Abscissas, some mantissas, modules, modes, A root or two, a torus and a node: The inverse of my verse, a null domain.
With four? Doing a little... Addition? Multiplication?
It is indeed a surprising and fortunate fact that nature can be expressed by relatively low-order mathematical functions.
Complete knowledge of the nature of an analytic function must also include insight into its behavior for imaginary values of the arguments. Often the latter is indispensable even for a proper appreciation of the behavior of the function for real arguments. It is therefore essential that the original determination of the function concept be broadened to a domain of magnitudes which includes both the real and the imaginary quantities, on an equal footing, under the single designation complex numbers.
I turn away with fright and horror from the lamentable evil of functions which do not have derivatives.
Analysis takes back with one hand what it gives with the other. I recoil in fear and loathing from that deplorable evil: continuous functions with no derivatives.
I was very into math and calculus, and just always was very - really interested in that. But any sort of numbers.
My basic mathematics is rather weak, so when some of the theories are broken into equations, I get rather lost.
