What we want is to establish the rules of a market economy - not to plan its outcome.
I don't want artists to find themselves in a situation where there are only two buyers. That just doesn't seem like a good outcome.
If someone thinks of something, some new innovation that benefits us all, and the market works properly, they get richly rewarded for that, and that's just terrific, and that creates inequality.
The fact that the market is not doing what we wish it would do is no reason to automatically assume that the government would do better.
In the market economy the price that is offered is counted upon to produce the result that is sought.
Everybody has a different strategy, but everybody agrees that active management does not beat the market.
I think that, in the end, the consumer's going to win on the Internet.
The best and most innovative products don't always win...(it's an) aesthetic flaw in how the universe worked
The argument for the free market is a complicated and sophisticated one and depends on demonstration of secondary effects. I have confidence market efficiency will win out.
