I am for world-control of production and of trade and transport, for a world coinage, and the confederation of mankind. I am for the super-State.
He who regards the world as he does the fortune of his own body can govern the world. He who loves the world as he does his own body can be entrusted with the world.
I don't think it's any different if I'm in the U.S. or in London. I look at operations globally.
I routinely make trips to China and India where we have offices to continue to maintain the linkages that are necessary to run a successful business.
The U.N. is one of many competitors in a marketplace of global problem solving.
Western powers remain imprisoned by the idea that the world is a dangerous place, that it needs to be managed, and that they are called upon to do the managing.
Turning the Internet over to the U.N. or some other phony international organization would be a disaster, and I am not willing to stand by and let it happen.
With offices in 64 cities around the world, it is sometimes a challenge to ensure that I've got my finger on the pulse with every one, everywhere. Staying in touch means early rising for calls with China and Japan, and late calls with the U.S.
I think as a manager you want to manage at the highest level possible and international management is one of those higher levels.
No country can act wisely simultaneously in every part of the globe at every moment of time.
The time has come to develop integrated global policies.
There ought to be a better way than government to run the world.
Directing while overcoming differences of language and culture is a stimulating challenge.
If democracy is ever to be threatened, it will not be by revolutionary groups burning government offices and occupying the broadcasting and newspaper offices of the world. It will come from disenchantment, cynicism and despair caused by the realisation that the New World Order means we are all to be managed and not represented.
For nearly five decades the World Federalists have worked to promote a strengthened UN and more effective institutions of global governance. I offer my personal endorsement. Now a great opportunity has opened for the realization of the dreams of the UN's founders.
A deal must include an equitable global governance structure. All countries must have a voice in how resources are deployed and managed.
I'm in charge of the State Department's 60,000-plus people all over the world, 275 posts.
Ford, as I understand it, had done away with the concept of regional management, and now they've re-introduced that in Europe, so it's kind of a two-way street.
One of the greatest threats to mankind today is that the world may be choked by an explosively pervading but well camouflaged bureaucracy.
There are a group of people who are managing the world to their advantage and who just look to the rest of us as people who will buy their products and fund their salaries.
I am responsible for managing more schoolteachers' and firemen's money than anybody in the world. That's an enormous responsibility.
A CEO of a multinational global company can't say what to do; you've got to plant the flag.
Reagan was conservative, but he didn't approach global management with an unbending religious zeal.
