I'm not famous; I am simply very well-known to certain people. Famous is something different.
I have just wanted to be an actress. That's always been my goal. I didn't want to be famous.
Chefs aren't celebrities: they're chefs.
I'm an actress, not a celebrity.
When I was super famous, there was definitely a distinction between how one was treated if they were on TV and how one was treated if they were on film. I don't know that that distinction exists as much now.
I only ever wanted to be an actress, not a star.
Joan Crawford is a movie star. I am an actress.
I'm not a star, I'm an actor - there's a difference!
If you look at my job, my union card, it says 'actor.' It don't say nothing about celebrity, movie star, nothing like that, and that's one thing that keeps me humble.
The thing is, you choose to be an actress, but not to be a celebrity.
When you're a performer, of course you want an audience, but it's very, very different from courting fame.
What I want to be is an actor, not a star.
I don't consider being a musician the same thing as being a celebrity.
There'll always be a difference between a star and an actor. I've nothing against stars. They've earned it and deserve it. I'm happy being just an actor.
I love being an entertainer - not really fond of being a celebrity.
I don't like the word celebrity. If I become a good actress and be in movies where I'm expected to be a good actress, who is recognised, that's different to being what I consider to be a celebrity. My job is an actor and that's what I'm passionate about and adore. It's a privilege to be able to do this job for a living.
I've only ever wanted to be a singer; I never wanted to be famous.
I'd sort of acquired somewhat more mature perspective on what my career is and I don't...not anymore...consider fame and fortune my career. I'm not a star. I'm an actor. So in a way, what I want to do as an actor, I would consider good for my career. Does that make sense?
