The science has changed from ambiguous to near-unanimous... Based on the data I'm now switching sides regarding global warming, from skeptic to convert.
Several indisputable facts appear evident in geological and climate science that make me a true 'denier' of human-caused global warming.
I believed in global warming after Al Gore's movie made money; the market had spoken.
The idea that we have the capacity to change or stop the climate, I'm just skeptical.
For us to try and step in and say we have got to do all these global things to prevent the earth from getting any warmer in my opinion is absolute nonsense. It’s not going to happen
I don't think there is any global warming. I don't see the statistical data for that.
Once upon a time, I was a climate-change skeptic.
For someone to say that someone's a skeptic or a climate denier about the climate changing, that's just nonsensical. We see that throughout history. We impact the climate by our activity. How much so is very difficult to determine with respect to our CO2 or carbon footprint, but we obviously do.
My first inclination is to be a bit skeptical about the claims that human-produced carbon dioxide is the direct contributor to global warming.
The governor of Texas was a real climate change, well, "skeptic" would be a nice way of phrasing it. Still, though, Texas is a leader in renewables. So, what I care about is what politicians are actually doing, not what they are saying.
I'm not a big believer in man-made climate change.
