You like me, or you hate me. There's really no in between.
You are either with us or against us…
Bush was addressing all countries in the wake of the September 11 attack on New York and Washington.
I am black or white, I'll never be grey in my life.
Why does it have to be so cut-and-dried? In your view, I either have to hate them or be in league with them. There’s a middle ground, you know. I can still be loyal to the Alchemists and on friendly terms with vampires and dhampirs.
Anything that has only two choices is wrong.
People, y'know, they either love us or they hate us; there's no middle ground.
I think I'm like Marmite; you either love me or you hate me.
We want to live in the black and white, but we don't. The world is gray. And, I'm always fascinated by people who are clearly, 'This is black and this is white, and that's the way life is.' Life always has something to say about that.
As a species, we're addicted to the facile discrimination involved in saying that something or phenomenon is either 'this' or 'that' - how much more uncomfortable that it may well be 'the other'.
I am a man who likes to control things, and if I can't control them totally I will not control them at all.
I'm like Bush, I see the world more like checkers than chess.
My father had a great sense of humor. He wasn't only the Man in Black. He said it himself in the song 'Man in Black:' 'Ah, I'd love to wear a rainbow every day.' He was a man of hope.
I live in the extremes.
People are always trying to draw simplistic dialectics that can capture things.
I don't like the 'must', the 'always', and the 'never' words. I don't like 'no' either.
I'm a guy who has problems with moderation. All or nothing. Binge and purge. Kill or be killed. Gray is not a color I wear well. I should be dead. I know that. I should not be successful. I know that too. My daily existence is a toss of the coin - one side, fear, the other side, gratitude.
Security people are often the black-and-white kind of people that I can't stand. I think the OpenBSD crowd is a bunch of masturbating monkeys, in that they make such a big deal about concentrating on security to the point where they pretty much admit that nothing else matters to them.
The enemy of the moment always represented absolute evil, and it followed that any past or future agreement with him was impossible.
I have often been amused by our vulgar tendency to take complex issues, with solutions at neither extreme of a continuum of possibilities, and break them into dichotomies, assigning one group to one pole and the other to an opposite end, with no acknowledgment of subtleties and intermediate positions and nearly always with moral opprobrium attached to opponents.
I desire what is good. Therefore, everyone who does not agree with me is a traitor.
Our society has lost its taste for complexity and nuance…. We want simple answers …. We have almost disabled our politicians from speaking.
The organizer must become schizoid, politically, in order to slip into becoming a true believer. Before men can act an issue must be polarized. Men will act when they are convinced their cause is 100 percent on the side of the angels and that the opposition are 100 percent on the side of the devil. He knows there can be no action until issues are polarized to this degree.
The man who sees absolutes, where all other men see nuances and shades of meaning, is either a prophet, or a quack.
...Do you see things in black and white, or are there shades of gray for you?" "I hope there's gray...Black and white make things easier, but only if you don't want to think.
Damn all false dichotomies to hell