Mark Zuckerberg Quotes

We asked people why they didn't go to MySpace. A lot of people thought it was too hard to use, they thought it was a music site, or a content site. Privacy was a concern, or they'd say it was a site for teenagers.

There's only a few platforms that really aggregate content well together, Facebook being one of the best, probably the most diverse of all of them.

When I signed up for Google Plus, my reaction after playing around with it for a little bit was like, 'Huh, I think Facebook should be scared.' In part, because it's a really elegant product. It's very fast.

Radio and TV can still push a band, but things need to be shaken up. There is the Internet, but mostly what I see there is little kids on YouTube playing music.

Myspace was always a bit edgy. People identified it with edginess and music.

When we are thinking about stuff like embeds, we are not thinking about how we are competing with YouTube. We are thinking about how are we going to make it more useful for people to share stuff on Facebook.

We just think that there are all these different ways that people want to share, and that compressing them all into a single blue app is not the right format of the future.

In order for a service to be social, you've really got to start from the ground up. The fact that almost a third of the U.S. population have even heard of Spotify is really because they've seen it on Facebook and friends have been sharing.

The Internet was a saving grace for promoting and exposing, and even creating. It's a parallel world to the music industry that already exists, and I'm glad to be a part of it.

Facebook, Twitter, and Tumblr are all 'User First, Brands Second' services. The brands are all over these services now. But for the most part, these services didn't do much to bring them. The engaged users did.

Companies like Pinterest and Twitter did not become sensations because of Google search but because of the many ways users find out about great sites.

The idea was that if it was a cool thing to do online, you should be able to do it on MySpace.

I have a playlist for every mood.

'Instagram' is an app that only took 8 weeks to build and ship but was a product of over a year of work.

TV is no longer the best alternative to boredom. To kids not old enough for Snapchat, music is the best alternative to boredom. For Snapchat users, it's the best alternative to boredom.

I rarely tweet unless I'm talking about 'The Bachelor.' I have a love/hate relationship with Instagram, though - it's like a rigid parent. It's much more restrictive with what can be posted, but you can write a full paragraph, post a video - it changes the game a little bit.

Almost all the things you can do online can be enhanced by the social structure of MySpace.

It's amazing what social media has done for entertainment.

I think it's hard to compare 'Twitter' and 'Instagram'. Twitter has a more mature business.

You have social networking, and you can do things efficiently without the might of a big label.

Our goal is to allow people to use whatever app they want to get photos into 'Instagram'.

A playlist can be very versatile, almost like a programming language.

Twitter's more fast-paced. Instagram, it's more, like, lifestyle and posting very specific, cool pictures.

Clearly there's value in Twitter and Facebook; otherwise, none of us would be involved in it.

YouTube is amazing because you really don't have to wait for anyone to showcase your work. Social media in general is like that. People can connect with it all over the world.