Kriti Kharbanda Quotes

People liked my performances in 'Kill Dill' and 'Happy Ending,' but I was hardly there in them.

The hardest thing to do in movies is be a day-part player. You have to go in, make your mark, and get out. There's a lot of leading actors who are not good for a lot of a movie, and then suddenly they have good moments, and they're like stepping-stones across a particularly feisty stream. They build careers out of that.

It is funny because, honestly, there isn't much I got to do in 'Kabir Singh' in terms of acting, but many are appreciating what I have done.

What is important to me is the mileage a particular role I depict gets on the silver screen.

I have proved my skills as an actress who can perform both character and glamour roles and 'Uyir' would take me to greater heights.

When I did a serious role in 'Koshish,' people said that I didn't look good.

If my films do well or not, I am glad that the audiences appreciate my performance.

Essentially, I'm a small-part actor who's been lucky enough to play leading roles for most of his life.

It's never been important to be a huge star or to have some breakout role. If you're the lead, you get a lot more screen time and you get a lot more chances to develop that character more thoroughly than you would if you do it in a little supporting part.

My first film, 'Like Minds,' was with Toni Colette, who was extraordinary. I mean it was basically a mini-masterclass for acting on film at a time when all you could probably see were my eyebrows bouncing up and down on screen.

If you're playing a lead, you're shaping the movie. When you're playing a supporting role, you've got only a moment to make it count.

At the end, it's your movie and your performance that stands out. So if I am a good actor, and if am being part of good entertaining engaging films, audiences will like me.

When you're in something as successful as 'Transformers,' you can't use it as a sales piece for your ability as an actress because it's all about the special effects.

An actor should never be larger than the film he's in.

I would hate to be thrust into the middle of a big film and not deliver. There's young actors and they're put into these central roles and they're commanding armies - but they can't quite pull it off. I'd much rather do it in small steps and build it from there.

I didn't think Comfort and Joy was going to be a box-office smash.

The effort always remains that my new film outdoes my last in terms of performance and gets better box office success. Box office is the sole reason why I do films.

It's better to do a film that works.

I played few hero roles in the initial days of my career, but audiences loved me for my comic timing and, therefore, I later turned comedian.

I've always done character roles and tons of movies as the so-called star, but I always felt I was one of the team.

I don't believe in terminologies like 'lead role' or 'supporting role' or 'cameo role,' etc.

I have done performance-based roles earlier, films which revolved around me. 'Kshatriya' was one such solid role. And, at that time, people had written good things about it.

My fans loved 'Rathnavel Pandian,' as they love mass, but 'Theeran' gave me complete satisfaction.

Since 'Qismat' did well independently, it was embraced by Bollywood.

There's a fine line between lead actor and supporting actor.