Sonali Bendre Quotes

I was keenly aware that everybody would have loved for me to do a close sequel or a spin-off to 'Marley and Me.'

As for 'Independence Day,' we never intended to do any films in that series beyond the first one.

It's just assumed that a horror sequel is going to be bad. It's never going to be as good as the first one.

With a sequel, you always worry for its integrity.

I mean, I would say I get five or six e-mails every day from people asking, "Is there going to be a Leprechaun 6?' It's probably the most asked question besides, 'Is there going to be a Willow II?'

The impossibility of a sequel ever recapturing everything - or anything - about its ancestor never stopped legions of writers from trying, or hordes of readers and publishers from demanding more of what they previously enjoyed.

An established property can be a blessing and a challenge. On one hand you have all those fans of the original that you can pick up with and continue on with but then you have a lot of people out there who haven't seen the first and might feel like this isn't a movie for them because of that.

Sequels are desperate.

Now 'Boondock II,' people are gonna see it because they liked the first one. There won't be very many people who go see it who aren't familiar with the first one.

I've often thought that we left the original 'Phantom' with a little bit of a cliff hanger, and I thought, 'Well, why not to do a sequel to it' at one point.

As we all know, sequels can be tricky.

I always get excited when I find out there's a sequel, because all the work is kind of done.

'Independence Day,' ever since we did it, there's been enormous pressure to follow it up.

We don't want John Wick to retire again; we're glad he's back in the game. We want a sequel or a prequel. There's a lot of fertile ground to cover.

There should be a sequel to 'Sarfarosh'. It was a different film.

I never wanted 'Toy Story 3' to feel like another sequel just grafted on. We all know that if you put 3 after your title, it typically means garbage, and we knew that going in.

I have no plans of doing a series of 'Raja' films.

Is it ever too late for a sequel?

Even when I was writing the script for 'Don,' I suspected it could lead to a sequel.

I haven't done a movie without a member of the original cast of 'Zombieland' - they've all been in every movie I've done.

We knew no matter how well 'Phir Hera Pheri' does, it would always be compared to 'Hera Pheri.' Yet, we took it as a challenge.

I'm just the second Bodhi. I think there will be more. I have the feeling this is only the first re-imagination of 'Point Break'.

'The Conjuring' was a massive success, and honestly, it set the bar quite high. So I was nervous about making the sequel, and I wasn't sure if it will still have the same impact as the first one did. But that's what moved me to make the sequel.

People still come up to me and say, 'Hey, 'Teen Wolf!' 'Teen Wolf Too' closed a week after it opened. Where did they see it?

With every film, the pressure is on the rise for the next.