Satya Nadella Quotes

My principal professional objective is to introduce intelligence as the ubiquitous utility. I'd like to be the Thomas Edison of intelligence.

The sad thing about artificial intelligence is that it lacks artifice and therefore intelligence.

By 2029, computers will have emotional intelligence and be convincing as people.

I am the Chenbot!

I am suggesting that we recognize that in network and interface research there is something as profound (and potential wild) as Artificial Intelligence.

A smart model is a good model.

If you want a machine to be able to interact with people, it better not do things that are surprising to people.

Artificial intelligence is growing up fast, as are robots whose facial expressions can elicit empathy and make your mirror neurons quiver.

You'll see more and more perfection of that - computer as servant. But the next thing is going to be computer as a guide or agent.

Artificial intelligence will reach human levels by around 2029. Follow that out further to, say, 2045, we will have multiplied the intelligence, the human biological machine intelligence of our civilization a billion-fold.

The key to artificial intelligence has always been the representation.

Is artificial intelligence less than our intelligence?

As a science fiction fan, I had always assumed that when computers supplemented our intelligence, it would be because we outsourced some of our memory to them. We would ask questions, and our machines would give oracular - or supremely practical - replies.

There is no such thing as transparent intelligence.

The thing that's going to make artificial intelligence so powerful is its ability to learn, and the way AI learns is to look at human culture.

Despite all the hype and excitement about AI, it's still extremely limited today relative to what human intelligence is.

Data is going to be dynamic... and, combined with the performance of computing that allows for artificial intelligence to be applied, is going to bring all kinds of insights and additives to enhance everyday life.

I'd rather see artificial intelligence than no intelligence.

If we can make computers more intelligent - and I want to be careful of AI hype - and understand the world and the environment better, it can make life so much better for many of us. Just as the Industrial Revolution freed up a lot of humanity from physical drudgery I think AI has the potential to free up humanity from a lot of the mental drudgery.

To make real progress in A.I., we have to overcome the big challenges in the area of common sense.

The future of Windows is to let the computer see, listen and even learn.

Even though chess isn't the toughest thing that computers will tackle for centuries, it stood as a handy symbol for human intelligence. No matter what human-like feat computers perform in the future, the Deep Blue match demands an indelible dot on all timelines of AI progress.

Artificial intelligence, in fact, is obviously an intelligence transmitted by conscious subjects, an intelligence placed in equipment. It has a clear origin, in fact, in the intelligence of the human creators of such equipment.

There will come a time when the human race and super intelligence will coexist to create a richer and happier life.

Some people call this artificial intelligence, but the reality is this technology will enhance us. So instead of artificial intelligence, I think we'll augment our intelligence.