Pam Bondi Quotes

The social relations which are the basis of the reproduction of the species are founded upon the continuous union of parents in marriage.

It is statistically proven that the strongest institution that guarantees procreation and continuity of the generations is marriage between one man and one woman. We don't want genocide. We don't want to destroy the sacred institution of marriage.

Every society in the history of man has upheld the institution of marriage as a bond between a man and a woman. Why? Because society is based on one thing: that society is based on the future of the society. And that's what? Children. Monogamous relationships.

Marriage is not about love. It is about a love that can bear children.

The reason we privilege marriage and tie benefits to it is to protect and encourage the institution into which new life comes. That's why we have benefits because traditional marriage creates children and that is where they have the most opportunity to grow up to be healthy, happy children. To extend the same benefits to relationships that do not create children surely dismantles the very reasons for those benefits.

It is just that I don't want a wife and I don't want kids.

The human race could not go on without reproduction, and marriage creates the most secure environment in which to raise children.

I feel like it's a natural progression for two people in love to talk about having children and taking that next step in creating a family.

I would be ready to become a dad if I was with the right person. I'd like a boy, though. Because they're in charge.

Marriage is obsolete and a trap.

Woman, or more precisely put, perhaps, marriage, is the representative of life with which you are meant to come to terms.

Oh yeah, I think about kids all the time. I feel like the next person I commit to, that's going to be the guy who I'm going to have kids with. That's in my crazy female brain. So that's why I'm like, 'I can't commit.'

Having children with someone is the real bond.

The reality of marriage as the union of a mother and a father is grounded in our very biology.

I'm not really interested in thinking about marriage or kids at all.

Marry good men and bear good sons.

The state does not belong in bedrooms. So I'm not authoritarian. I don't say: 'You shouldn't do this, you must do that.' What I do say is that the state must have a preferred model, and the model that has served us throughout the millennia is marriage - a man and a woman in a union that is generally open to procreation.

When I decide I want to have children with somebody, I think it would be nice to be married to that person.

I feel like I'm the kind of guy that would have kids before getting married. The first thing would be kids.

I don't think marriage is in the cards for me. I think it's an archaic institution.

I definitely want a family.

I don't believe in the institution of marriage.

Marriage does figure in my life, as I do want to have children. But I could also consider having children without getting married. The primary thing is having a good father, a partner who could be there with me through that journey.

Marriage has historically, as long as there's been human history, meant a man and a woman in a relationship for life. Once we change that definition, then where does it go from there?

I'm at a stage in my life when I want a wife and a family.